首页> 外文OA文献 >Using question words or asking yes/no questions: Failure and success in clarifying the intentions of a boy with high-functioning autism
【2h】

Using question words or asking yes/no questions: Failure and success in clarifying the intentions of a boy with high-functioning autism

机译:使用疑问词或询问是/否问题:澄清一个患有高功能自闭症的男孩的意图的失败和成功

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examined the processes that resulted in an adult failing to comprehend the intentions of a boy with high-functioning autism. In a dyadic conversation between an adult and a young boy, the adult used questions to elicit clarification of intentions. The boy's responses were examined frame-by-frame using videotape microanalysis. Two causes of adult misunderstanding were formulaic use of words that confused the listener and directional gaze away from the listener. Questions that used interrogatives often failed to clarify the intention of the boy and yes/no questions appeared suitable to clarify his intention. However, success or failure to clarify an intention was not based solely on differences in the question format. Differences in question content may also have been relevant. Yes/no questions were mainly used to ask about specific actions. On the other hand, interrogative questions were used to handle cognitive or meta-cognitive matters.
机译:本文研究了导致成年人无法理解自闭症男孩的意图的过程。在成年人和年轻男孩之间的直言不讳的对话中,成年人使用问题来阐明意图。使用录像带显微分析逐帧检查了男孩的反应。成人误解的两个原因是公式化使用会使听众感到困惑的单词,以及定向视线远离听众的原因。使用疑问句的问题通常无法澄清男孩的意图,是/否问题似乎适合于澄清他的意图。但是,澄清意图的成功或失败并非仅基于问题格式的差异。问题内容的差异也可能是相关的。是/否问题主要用于询问特定操作。另一方面,疑问句被用来处理认知或元认知问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Oi, Manabu;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号